Basketball fans witnessed an exciting showdown when the Charlotte Hornets faced off against the Philadelphia 76ers on December 20, 2024.
This game showcased everything we love about NBA basketball – star players stepping up, team strategies unfolding, and competitive spirit on full display.
The charlotte hornets vs 76ers match player stats tell a compelling story of how individual performances can shape the outcome of an entire game.
The Wells Fargo Center became the stage for this thrilling encounter, where the 76ers emerged victorious with a final score of 108-98.
What made this game particularly special was the return of Joel Embiid, who had been dealing with a sinus fracture.
His comeback performance, combined with solid contributions from teammates like Tyrese Maxey, created a perfect storm for Philadelphia’s success.
On the other side, the Charlotte Hornets showed their fighting spirit despite facing a tough opponent on the road.
Players like Vasilije Micic and Miles Bridges stepped up to lead their team’s offensive efforts.
The 76ers vs charlotte hornets match player stats reveal how both teams approached this game differently, with varying levels of success.
This detailed analysis breaks down every aspect of the game, from individual player performances to team strategies.
Contents
Charlotte Hornets vs 76ers Match Player Stats
We’ll explore how each player contributed to their team’s efforts, examine the key moments that decided the game’s outcome, and understand what these statistics mean for both teams moving forward.
Whether you’re a dedicated basketball fan or someone who enjoys understanding the game better, this breakdown will give you valuable insights into professional basketball at its finest.
Game Overview
The Philadelphia 76ers dominated this matchup from the opening tip-off, establishing control early and maintaining it throughout the game.
The final score of 108-98 doesn’t fully capture how commanding the 76ers were during crucial stretches of this contest.
The game started with Philadelphia making a strong statement in the first quarter. They outscored Charlotte 41-23, setting the tone for what would become a decisive victory.
This early surge wasn’t just about scoring – it was about establishing rhythm, building confidence, and putting pressure on the visiting team.
Key Game Flow:
- First Quarter: 76ers took a commanding 41-23 lead
- Third Quarter: Philadelphia extended its advantage with a crucial 19-4 scoring run
- Final Lead: The 76ers led by as much as 22 points (73-51)
- Charlotte’s Response: The Hornets made a late push but couldn’t overcome the deficit
The turning point came in the third quarter when Philadelphia executed a devastating 19-4 scoring run.
This sequence showcased their offensive firepower and defensive intensity, effectively putting the game out of reach for Charlotte.
Joel Embiid’s return from injury provided the 76ers with the dominant presence they had been missing.
His ability to score efficiently while also setting up teammates created multiple problems for Charlotte’s defense.
Meanwhile, Tyrese Maxey’s perimeter shooting stretched the floor and gave Philadelphia additional offensive weapons.
Charlotte showed resilience throughout the game, particularly in the fourth quarter when they tried to mount a comeback.
However, the early deficit proved too much to overcome against a 76ers team that was clicking on both ends of the floor.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats
The 76ers’ victory was built on balanced scoring and exceptional individual performances. Their players stepped up in different ways, creating a well-rounded team effort that Charlotte couldn’t match.
| Player | Points | FG (Made-Attempted) | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks | Turnovers | Fouls | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel Embiid | 34 | 12-24 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +10 |
| Tyrese Maxey | 23 | 8-18 (4-11 3PT) | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +8 |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | 12 | 4-7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +6 |
| Paul George | 10 | 3-8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +7 |
| Ricky Council IV | 8 | 3-4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +4 |
| Guerschon Yabusele | 6 | 3-5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +3 |
| Andre Drummond | 4 | 2-4 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +5 |
| Eric Gordon | 4 | 2-4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +2 |
Joel Embiid’s Dominant Return:
- Led all scorers with 34 points on efficient 50% shooting
- Facilitated offense with team-high 9 assists
- Showed no signs of rust despite missing time with injury
- Controlled the paint on both ends of the floor
Tyrese Maxey’s Supporting Role:
- Added 23 crucial points with excellent three-point shooting
- Hit 4 of 11 attempts from beyond the arc
- Provided consistent scoring throughout the game
- Complemented Embiid’s inside presence perfectly
Role Players Stepping Up:
- Kelly Oubre Jr. contributed 12 points with efficient shooting
- Andre Drummond dominated the boards with 10 rebounds
- Paul George provided veteran leadership and solid two-way play
- Bench players like Ricky Council IV made meaningful contributions
The 76ers’ success came from their ability to get quality shots and move the ball effectively. Their 48.1% field goal percentage and 27 team assists showed how well they executed their offensive game plan.
This balanced attack made it difficult for Charlotte to focus their defensive efforts on stopping any single player.
Charlotte Hornets Player Stats
Despite the loss, several Hornets players delivered solid individual performances. Their effort and fight throughout the game demonstrated the team’s character, even when facing a significant deficit.
| Player | Points | FG (Made-Attempted) | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks | Turnovers | Fouls | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasilije Micic | 20 | 7-14 (3-8 3PT) | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -9 |
| Miles Bridges | 15 | 4-13 (1-7 3PT) | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | -19 |
| DaQuan Jeffries | 12 | 5-9 (2-4 3PT) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +6 |
| Cody Martin | 11 | 5-10 (1-3 3PT) | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -14 |
| Isaiah Wong | 11 | 4-7 (1-2 3PT) | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +2 |
| Nick Richards | 10 | 4-7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | -14 |
| Tidjane Salaun | 8 | 3-8 (2-5 3PT) | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +3 |
| Moussa Diabate | 7 | 2-4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +4 |
| Josh Green | 4 | 2-4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -6 |
Vasilije Micic’s Leadership:
- Led the Hornets with 20 points on solid 50% shooting
- Hit 3 of 8 three-point attempts to keep Charlotte competitive
- Provided steady playmaking with 4 assists
- Showed efficiency with minimal turnovers
Miles Bridges’ Struggles:
- Contributed 15 points and 7 rebounds, but shot poorly
- Made only 1 of 7 three-point attempts
- Turned the ball over 5 times, hurting Charlotte’s offensive flow
- Despite struggles, provided energy and defensive presence
Young Players Making Impact:
- Tidjane Salaun showcased versatility with 8 points, 8 rebounds, and 5 assists
- Isaiah Wong provided a scoring punch off the bench
- DaQuan Jeffries was one of the few Hornets with a positive plus-minus
The Hornets faced challenges with their 42.4% field goal percentage and 20 team assists, both lower than Philadelphia’s numbers. Their balanced scoring effort wasn’t enough to overcome the 76ers’ superior execution and efficiency.
Comparative Analysis
When we examine both teams’ performances side by side, several key differences emerge that explain the outcome of this game.
| Category | Philadelphia 76ers | Charlotte Hornets | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 48.1% | 42.4% | 76ers |
| Total Assists | 27 | 20 | 76ers |
| Total Rebounds | 45 | 43 | 76ers (slight) |
| Leading Scorer | Joel Embiid (34) | Vasilije Micic (20) | 76ers |
| Bench Production | Solid contributions | Limited impact | 76ers |
| Three-Point Shooting | More efficient | Struggled overall | 76ers |
Shooting Efficiency Comparison: The 76ers’ superior shooting percentage (48.1% vs 42.4%) played a crucial role in their victory. This difference means Philadelphia made nearly 6 more shots out of every 100 attempts compared to Charlotte. Over the course of an entire game, this efficiency gap translates to significant point differences.
Ball Movement Analysis: Philadelphia’s 27 assists compared to Charlotte’s 20 show how much better the 76ers moved the ball. Good ball movement leads to:
- Better shot opportunities
- Less contested shots
- Involvement of all players
- Harder defense to predict and stop
Rebounding Battle: While rebounding was nearly even (45-43 in favor of Philadelphia), the 76ers got crucial rebounds at important moments. Andre Drummond’s 10 rebounds provided second-chance opportunities and limited Charlotte’s offensive possessions.
Star Power Difference: Joel Embiid’s 34 points overshadowed any single Charlotte performance. Having a dominant star player who can take over games provides teams with a reliable source of offense when other options aren’t working.
Key Moments and Strategies
Several pivotal moments and strategic decisions shaped this game’s outcome. Understanding these turning points helps explain how Philadelphia built and maintained its winning advantage.
The Decisive Third Quarter Run: The game’s most important sequence came in the third quarter when Philadelphia outscored Charlotte 19-4 during a crucial stretch. This run:
- Extended the 76ers’ lead from manageable to commanding
- Broke Charlotte’s spirit and momentum
- Showcased Philadelphia’s offensive firepower
- Demonstrated their ability to execute under pressure
Philadelphia’s Strategic Approach:
- Inside-Out Game: Using Embiid’s post presence to create outside opportunities
- Ball Movement: Moving the ball quickly to find open shots
- Defensive Pressure: Forcing Charlotte into difficult shots and turnovers
- Bench Contributions: Getting meaningful minutes from role players
Charlotte’s Counter-Strategies:
- Balanced Scoring: Trying to match Philadelphia’s firepower with multiple contributors
- Perimeter Shooting: Attempting to stretch Philadelphia’s defense
- Aggressive Defense: Trying to create turnovers and fast-break opportunities
- Late Game Push: Making a final effort to cut into the deficit
Why Charlotte’s Strategies Fell Short:
- Inconsistent three-point shooting limited their ability to close the gap quickly
- Turnovers (especially from Miles Bridges) hurt their offensive rhythm
- Lack of a dominant scorer to match Embiid’s production
- Inability to stop Philadelphia’s third-quarter run
Impact of Player Performances
Individual performances often determine game outcomes in professional basketball. This game provided several examples of how specific players influenced their team’s success or struggles.
Joel Embiid’s Game-Changing Return: His comeback performance after injury provided multiple benefits:
- Scoring Leadership: 34 points gave Philadelphia a reliable offensive focal point
- Playmaking: 9 assists showed his improved court vision and willingness to involve teammates
- Intimidation Factor: His presence altered Charlotte’s offensive approach
- Emotional Boost: His return energized the home crowd and teammates
Tyrese Maxey’s Perfect Complement: Maxey’s 23 points perfectly supported Embiid’s dominance:
- Perimeter Threat: His three-point shooting (4-11) stretched Charlotte’s defense
- Secondary Scoring: Provided reliable points when Embiid needed rest
- Court Spacing: His shooting ability opened driving lanes for teammates
- Clutch Shooting: Hit important shots during Philadelphia’s decisive runs
Miles Bridges’ Costly Struggles: Despite his effort, Bridges’ performance hurt Charlotte’s chances:
- Shooting Woes: 1-7 from three-point range limited Charlotte’s offensive flow
- Turnover Problems: 5 turnovers led to easy Philadelphia scoring opportunities
- Missed Opportunities: Failed to capitalize when Philadelphia’s defense focused on other players
Vasilije Micic’s Bright Spot: His team-leading 20 points provided hope for Charlotte:
- Efficient Scoring: 50% shooting showed he could get quality shots
- Leadership: His steady play kept Charlotte competitive during difficult stretches
- Three-Point Shooting: 3-8 from beyond the arc gave Charlotte some perimeter production
Statistical Highlights
The numbers from this game reveal deeper insights into both teams’ performances and overall approaches to basketball.
Shooting Statistics Breakdown:
- Philadelphia’s Advantage: Their 48.1% field goal percentage came from better shot selection and ball movement
- Charlotte’s Challenge: 42.4% shooting indicated they took more difficult, contested shots
- Three-Point Battle: Both teams struggled from deep, but Philadelphia was slightly more efficient
Assist-to-Turnover Ratios:
- Philadelphia: 27 assists with fewer turnovers showed better ball security
- Charlotte: 20 assists with more turnovers indicated rushed possessions and poor decision-making
Rebounding Analysis:
- Offensive Rebounds: Philadelphia’s slight edge gave them more second-chance opportunities
- Defensive Rebounds: Both teams did well securing defensive boards
- Individual Dominance: Andre Drummond’s 10 rebounds provided Philadelphia with a clear advantage
Plus-Minus Insights:
- Philadelphia’s Depth: Multiple players with positive plus-minus ratings
- Charlotte’s Struggles: Several key players finished with negative ratings
- Game Impact: These numbers show which players helped their teams during their minutes on court
Efficiency Metrics:
- Points Per Possession: Philadelphia’s better shooting led to a more efficient offense
- Defensive Impact: The 76ers forced Charlotte into lower-percentage shots
- Bench Production: Philadelphia got better contributions from non-starters
FAQs:
- Who was the leading scorer for the Philadelphia 76ers?
Joel Embiid led the 76ers with 34 points, making 12 of 24 field goal attempts. His efficient scoring and 9 assists made him the game’s most impactful player.
- Who was the leading scorer for the Charlotte Hornets?
Vasilije Micic led the Hornets with 20 points on 7-14 shooting. He also contributed 4 assists and hit 3 three-pointers to keep Charlotte competitive.
- How many rebounds did Joel Embiid have?
Joel Embiid grabbed 7 rebounds while focusing primarily on scoring and playmaking. Andre Drummond led Philadelphia with 10 rebounds.
- Who had the most assists for the 76ers?
Joel Embiid led Philadelphia with 9 assists, showing his improved court vision and willingness to get teammates involved in the offense.
- What was the final score of the game?
The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Charlotte Hornets 108-98 in a game played at the Wells Fargo Center on December 20, 2024.
- How did the 76ers build their lead?
Philadelphia established control with a dominant 41-23 first quarter, then extended their advantage with a crucial 19-4 scoring run in the third quarter that put the game away.
- What made Joel Embiid’s performance special?
Embiid was returning from a sinus fracture injury, making his 34-point, 9-assist performance even more impressive. He showed no signs of rust and dominated both ends of the floor.
- Why did Charlotte struggle in this game?
The Hornets faced several challenges: poor three-point shooting (especially from Miles Bridges), 5 turnovers from their key player, and inability to match Philadelphia’s early intensity.
Conclusion:
The December 20, 2024, matchup between the Charlotte Hornets and Philadelphia 76ers showcased the importance of star players, team execution, and strategic basketball.
Joel Embiid’s triumphant return from injury, combined with Tyrese Maxey’s excellent supporting performance, powered the 76ers to a convincing 108-98 victory.
The Charlotte Hornets vs 76ers match player stats tell the story of two teams with different strengths and challenges.
Philadelphia’s superior shooting efficiency (48.1% vs 42.4%), better ball movement (27 vs 20 assists), and dominant individual performances created a winning formula that Charlotte couldn’t match.
For Philadelphia, this game demonstrated their potential when healthy.
Embiid’s combination of scoring and playmaking, supported by Maxey’s perimeter shooting and solid role player contributions, showed how dangerous this team can be.
Their ability to build early leads and execute decisive runs makes them a formidable opponent for any team.
Charlotte showed fight and character despite the loss. Vasilije Micic’s 20-point performance and the balanced scoring effort from multiple players revealed their depth and resilience.
However, struggles with shooting efficiency and ball security prevented them from staying competitive throughout the game.
This analysis demonstrates how individual performances, team strategies, and execution combine to determine game outcomes in professional basketball.
The statistical breakdown provides valuable insights for fans wanting to understand the game at a deeper level, showing how numbers tell the complete story of victory and defeat.
Also Check:
